wiki-armed forces

I have to congratulate HM Armed Forces for seeing an opportunity to raise recruitment and jumping on it.

I just googled a single word "wikileaks" and it returned a single sponsored result advertising:

Join the Special Forces

Learn how you can be a part of UK's Elite Special Forces squads
HMForces.co.uk/SpecialForces


I'm not sure if the Special Forces support or oppose wikileaks from this ad, but I love the plan.  Maybe I'll pay for searches on wikileaks for my work homepage.

Comments

  1. Loki12 December 2010 at 14:40

    Anything in particular on Wikileaks? As far as I can tell, all WL has shown if that the current Government (and it's many branches/quangos), are a bunch of self serving, mendacious wankers.

    Not sure if I needed Julian to tell me that!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ed (not Bystander)12 December 2010 at 18:29

    The ".co.uk" bit tells us it's not an official government website.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous13 December 2010 at 15:29

    "wikileaks" - Googled - About 389,000,000 results (0.16 seconds)

    Your internet is obviously broken.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Defence Brief15 December 2010 at 17:33

    Loki, I agree. Intersting but nothing I didn't already know/couldn't guess already.

    Ed, you're much cleverer than me.

    Anon, I said it returned a single sponsored result not that it returned only one result in total. In any case, you are usually right about my internet being broken.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ed (not Bystander)16 December 2010 at 04:14

    TDB, you are entirely too kind. Just offering a single point of information!

    By the way, how would I email you?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Defence Brief16 December 2010 at 16:02

    Ed, I suppose you could start by trying to send a message to nick@criminaldefencelondon.co.uk. That works for some, although Anon really was correct when he said my internet is broken as it mostly is.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are items referred to in s.9’s as exhibits bound to be served?

  Background - CPS served a witness statement on me that exhibited two BWV clips that are potentially relevant to the Crown’s case and may have some relevance to the defence case insofar as they are likely to show the lighting and weather at the time events happened. Somebody has listed the clips as unused material rather than putting them in the exhibits folder that accompanies the served evidence. This raised an interesting (to me anyway) question about whether a party who exhibits an item in a statement is bound to serve it on their opponent. At court the judge took the view that the Crown were at liberty to classify items exhibited in s9s as unused material if they chose not to rely upon them in evidence. I took the view that if they are exhibited then they must be served along with the witness statement that exhibits the item and that the solution to a situation where the Crown say they are now unused is to edit the witness statement to remove the reference, by agreement with ...
More gibberish >>

Is there twice as much violent crime in the UK versus the USA?

Image
The tweet from Charlie Kirk I came across a screenshot of a Twitter post while on Facebook this morning. The original post now has 11,000 retweets and 23,000 likes on Twitter. As you can see from the picture somebody called Charlie Kirk, who is a right-wing American commentator, claims that there are 933 violent crimes in the UK per 100,000 people. This is more than double the rate he claims for the USA where he says there are only 399 violent crimes per 100,000 people. The UK doesn’t feel that violent to me, so is it true? We’re all gonna die According to the FBI, in 2016 there were 1,248,185 violent crimes committed across the whole of the USA. That is an increase of 4.1% on the 2015 figure but still represented only 386.3 violent crimes per 100,000 people . So, Mr Kirk appears to be slightly overestimating the violent crime in the USA. I should say that I am using the 2016 figures as those are the latest available on the FBI website, so maybe he has slightly differe...
More gibberish >>

Driving without insurance

Image
Insurance is a contract that remains in force until it expires or is cancelled As you may, or may not, know I specialise in motoring law and most of my work involves defending people accused of drink driving . With the drink driving often come other road traffic offences such as driving while disqualified and driving without insurance. It’s driving without insurance I want to talk about today because I think far too many police officers, solicitors, barristers and judges miss a key legal point when looking at these cases. I’ve received prosecution papers today for somebody accused of driving while disqualified and driving without insurance. The no insurance element is claim that the suspect did not tell the insurer about the disqualification. In his statement, the police officers says, “ [I] contacted [the insurer] who called me back informing me they would not consider the insurance policy valid as there were no convictions disclosed.” Looks like an open an...
More gibberish >>