Skip to main content

Are judges unduly lenient?


Royal Courts of Justice - home of the Court of Appeal

I read a story in this morning’s Times entitled, “’Soft’ sentences increased for sex abusers and killers”. The story goes on to report that 102 criminals had their sentences increased following appeals by the Attorney General. Of those 102 cases, 40% involved sexual offences.

So, are judges being surprisingly lenient?

In the period March 2014 to March 2015, there were 1.72 million individuals dealt with by the Criminal Justice System, while that may sound a lot it is in fact a record low since 1970! This figure includes a large number who were dealt with in the magistrates’ courts rather than the Crown Court, from whence Attorney General's references all emanate. It seems that of that 1.72 million, only 80,000 cases made it to the Crown Court.

The Times makes the point that 40% of increased sentences were for sexual offences, based on 102 increased sentences I make that 40 cases. So, that’s 40 out of how many? In the 12 months to March 2015 there were 12,000 sexual offences proceedings, of which 6,400 resulted in convictions. This means that judges sentencing people for sexual offences were NOT unduly lenient in 99.4% of cases.

In all Crown Court cases, the judge was NOT unduly lenient in 99.87% of cases.

That does not mean though that judges get sentences correct virtually every time. Because, not only the Attorney General can appeal – defendants feeling themselves wronged by their judge also may lodge an appeal.

During the year to September 2012, there were 7,442 appeals against sentence or conviction lodged. Of those, 65% of appeals against sentence were refused by the single judge. Nonetheless, the full court went on to hear 2,001 appeals against sentence. Of those 25% were successful – that’s 500 people who were sentenced to a sentence that was “manifestly excessive”, which is the test for whether or not an appeal against sentence will succeed.

As with appeals by the Attorney General, figures for appeals against sentence do not include appeals from the magistrates’ courts.

Call me a cynic, but while I read in the national press of 102 cases of “soft sentencing” among a total of 80,000 cases, I don’t recall ever reading about the 500 men and women given sentences that were manifestly excessive!

Comments

  1. And what about the judges who erred on leniency? Do they have to face the headmaster?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suppose depending on the seriousness of the transgression it could well be time for them to surreptitiously slip a book down the back of their pants in preparation to face the headmaster.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ched Evans

Before I begin, I will say that at around 4,500 words this is probably the longest blog I’ve ever posted but I think it’s all necessary to set the scene for this case and explain the background that has been largely ignored or airbrushed in the press. Despite its length, I have not attempted to include every little detail of either fact or law but have done my best to provide a balanced picture of the Ched Evans case, what happened and why the courts reached the decisions they did. There has been so much written about the Ched Evans case over the past weekend, much of it based on a very shaky grasp of the facts and law, that I decided I would read up about the case and weigh in (hopefully on a slightly firmer footing than most of the articles I’ve read so far).

Broadly speaking there seem to be three groups who have opinions on the case:
1.Sexual violence groups (including people describing themselves as “radical feminists”) who appear to take the view that the case is awful, the Court o…

How do the police decide whether to charge a suspect?

A question I’m often asked by clients (and in a roundabout way by people arriving at this blog using searches that ask the question in a variety of ways), is “how do the police decide whether to charge or take no further action (NFA)?”
What are the options?
Let’s have a quick think about what options are available to the police at the end of an investigation.
First, they can charge or report you for summons to attend court.  Charging means that you are given police bail and are required to attend court in person.  A summons is an order from the court for you to attend or for you to send a solicitor on your behalf.  In many cases where a person is summonsed, the court will allow you the option of entering a plea by post.
Second, you may be given a caution.  These can be a simple caution, which on the face of it is a warning not to be naughty in future, or it can be a conditional caution.  Conditions could include a requirement to pay for the cost of damage or compensation, etc.  Either…

Bid to prevent defendants knowing who accuses them of a crime

When I read The Trial by Kafka and Nineteen Eighty-Four by Orwell, I took them as warnings of how a bad justice system wrecks lives of those caught up in it. Sadly, some Members of Parliament and the House of Lords seem to view the books more as a guide to how they would like our Criminal Justice System to run. Today, I read of plans to hide the names of accusers and witnesses from defendants in a large number of cases. Victims of sexual offences, such as rape, have had the right to lifelong anonymity for many years now. This means that it is a criminal offence to publish information that will lead to a complainant being identified. A Bill currently being considered by Parliament would extend that anonymity to bar defendants and their lawyers knowing the name of the person accusing them. This would apply not only in sexual offences, as has been reported in the press, but also in violent offences.
The anonymity currently offered to victims of sexual offences is not total, the complainant…