Skip to main content

The ban it brigade ride again

 
Fat woman holding anti-thin people sign
If you're thin you're not coming in - classy

One of the things that annoys me the most is politicians who think that the criminal law is a way to solve all of society’s ills.  Quite often I’m annoyed that politicians are claiming that the thing they are discussing is one of society’s ills but that’s a different story.

The thing that is annoying me today is the French and Caroline Noakes MP, she heads the All Parliamentary Group on Body Image, which sounds at once both a very specific topic and yet one with a very wide reach.  The French have created a criminal offence of using a thin model in a fashion show and Ms Noakes wants to introduce the same crime here.

In France those caught breaking the law face up to six-months imprisonment – the reports I’ve read are unclear whether that means prison for the organiser, the model booker or the model herself.  Who knows, maybe if we’re going to be really tough on crimes like this we should be imprisoning anybody caught looking at underweight models too?

As I understand it, the law in France bans the use of models with a BMI of 18.5 or below.  For those who don’t know BMI is a really bad way to measure the weight of an individual.  BMI is a measure of body mass across populations of people, for individuals it can be wholly unreliable.  Arnold Schwarzenegger is 6’2” and in his prime weighed around 235lbs giving him a BMI of 30.1 and placing him in the obese category.  Andrew Flintoff, the former England cricketer and elite sportsman, is well into the overweight category.

The reasoning behind such a crime is that thin models are a bad influence on young girls, which causes them to feel bad that they are not skinny enough and ultimately causes eating disorders.  That’s an overly simplistic description but it is not without some merit.  But, does that make a new criminal offence a good idea?

Anti-fat shaming advocates are wide spread and, like many noisy minority pressure groups, are becoming very influential in the media and, apparently, among politicians.  The irony of anti-fat shaming advocates is that what they campaign against for fat people is precisely what they do to skinny people – not long ago I read an account by a naturally skinny teenage girl who had seen one of the anti-fat shaming advocates on TV and was feeling pretty shitty about herself for being skinny; I doubt she is the only one.

Being underweight is bad for you, but let’s be honest it’s not nearly as serious an epidemic for the country as being overweight.  That’s not to say that people who are underweight and need help shouldn’t get it but the campaign against underweight models by anti-fat shaming advocates has a darker side in my opinion.  It isn’t aimed at helping those who are underweight but rather at diverting attention away from the real problem out society faces, which is the obesity epidemic.  With the greatest of respect to anti-fat shaming advocates everywhere, they do tend to be on the larger side and many are quite proud of it too.

Last year 2,560 people were admitted to hospital witheating disorders – while this doesn’t necessarily mean underweight the vast majority of eating disorder diagnoses involve being underweight rather than overweight.  In 2011/12 there were 11,750 hospitaladmissions “with a primary diagnosis of obesity” and that number appears to be rising. 

Presumably campaigners would agree that being underweight is unhealthy and that the point of their campaign is to improve health.  If so a law banning underweight models sounds like only half a job.  Surely if the aim is to promote healthy role models then plus size models should also be outlawed?  In fact, given that obesity led to more than four times as many hospital admissions than being underweight you might be forgiven for thinking that if the government is going to ban either it should be the promotion of overweight bodies as the norm.

Before anybody tells me that underweight models are far more common than overweight ones let me just stop you there for a minute because there are plenty of plus size models and model agencies.  If the ban is going to have any impact it needs to extend beyond the catwalk and cover newspapers, magazines and TV else what’s the point since those are the places most models are seen?


Even if you think that thin women shouldn’t be seen by small children then I have to tell you that the criminal law is not the tool to use to bring about that particular social change.  Criminal law is great for making the point that killing your neighbour isn’t acceptable but it’s really bad at trying to change what society views as attractive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ched Evans

Before I begin, I will say that at around 4,500 words this is probably the longest blog I’ve ever posted but I think it’s all necessary to set the scene for this case and explain the background that has been largely ignored or airbrushed in the press. Despite its length, I have not attempted to include every little detail of either fact or law but have done my best to provide a balanced picture of the Ched Evans case, what happened and why the courts reached the decisions they did. There has been so much written about the Ched Evans case over the past weekend, much of it based on a very shaky grasp of the facts and law, that I decided I would read up about the case and weigh in (hopefully on a slightly firmer footing than most of the articles I’ve read so far).

Broadly speaking there seem to be three groups who have opinions on the case:
1.Sexual violence groups (including people describing themselves as “radical feminists”) who appear to take the view that the case is awful, the Court o…

How do the police decide whether to charge a suspect?

A question I’m often asked by clients (and in a roundabout way by people arriving at this blog using searches that ask the question in a variety of ways), is “how do the police decide whether to charge or take no further action (NFA)?”
What are the options?
Let’s have a quick think about what options are available to the police at the end of an investigation.
First, they can charge or report you for summons to attend court.  Charging means that you are given police bail and are required to attend court in person.  A summons is an order from the court for you to attend or for you to send a solicitor on your behalf.  In many cases where a person is summonsed, the court will allow you the option of entering a plea by post.
Second, you may be given a caution.  These can be a simple caution, which on the face of it is a warning not to be naughty in future, or it can be a conditional caution.  Conditions could include a requirement to pay for the cost of damage or compensation, etc.  Either…

Bid to prevent defendants knowing who accuses them of a crime

When I read The Trial by Kafka and Nineteen Eighty-Four by Orwell, I took them as warnings of how a bad justice system wrecks lives of those caught up in it. Sadly, some Members of Parliament and the House of Lords seem to view the books more as a guide to how they would like our Criminal Justice System to run. Today, I read of plans to hide the names of accusers and witnesses from defendants in a large number of cases. Victims of sexual offences, such as rape, have had the right to lifelong anonymity for many years now. This means that it is a criminal offence to publish information that will lead to a complainant being identified. A Bill currently being considered by Parliament would extend that anonymity to bar defendants and their lawyers knowing the name of the person accusing them. This would apply not only in sexual offences, as has been reported in the press, but also in violent offences.
The anonymity currently offered to victims of sexual offences is not total, the complainant…