Customs officers

There maybe a border control or customs officer reading this blog, who knows.  I have to ask, why are UK borders and customs officers always so bloody miserable?

I went to France last weekend - FRANCE reputed to be the rudest country in Europe by some - and yet the customs officer bade my family and I a happy "bon jour" and cheerfully wished us a pleasant stay in his country.  I've been to France a few times and mostly they are always reasonably cheerful.

I was in Germany a year or so back and despite my stupidly buying a novel to take with a big swastika on the cover the border man was pleasant, albeit a little surprised.

I've visited Slovenia, Austria, Slovakia, Latvia, Estonia, Spain and Poland where everybody we met was pleasant.

In the USA even the stern border control officer managed a smile when he realised I wasn't a terrorist merely English.

Yet no matter how many times I go away I always have to come back and every time I do I'm met with a difficult unpleasant and occasionally rude customs officer.  On one occasion while travelling with friends I met the rudest official I've ever come across.  He actually shouted threats at my friend as my friend walked away and offered to fight him after work!!  My friend is the least offensive man you could ever meet - and at the time was a senior executive at the airport!

Honestly, the most pleasant experience I've ever had at passport control in the UK was at Heathrow when I found a machine that could check my passport for me.  No messing about demanding I remove my passport from its wallet (I only ever have the front cover slipped into the wallet so it can be read by the machine and every country I've ever been to manages to read it without a surly demand that the passport be removed from the wallet). The machine didn't ask any stupid questions about where I'd been, what I'd been doing, who I was travelling with, etc.  It just checked my passport, had a look at me and showed me a little green light to tell me to carry on.

When a machine is the most friendly border control officer in the UK something is clearly wrong.

Comments

  1. Kimpatsu27 September 2013 at 03:39

    You must remove your passport from its cover fully in countries such as Japan and South Korea, but they have racist border fingerprinting so there might be a link there.
    Psychological examination of British border officers shows that they are bureaucratic types who like inflicting petty miseries on travellers as a way of compensating for the fact that they hate their jobs. After all, who becomes a UK border officer? Answer: people who can't find any other type of work. No one wants to be a customs officer when they grow up.
    (BTW, it's "border", not "boarder"; the latter is a lodger.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Defence Brief21 October 2013 at 21:18

      Yep thanks for the spelling correction... *** red face ***

      Delete
    2. Anonymous19 June 2015 at 03:02

      I realise this is 2 years on, but had to comment as a former customs officer when I came across this 'reply'.

      What is "racist border fingerprinting"? And what is your evidence for such an accusation?

      "Psychological examination of British border officers shows that they are bureaucratic types who like inflicting petty miseries on travellers as a way of compensating for the fact that they hate their jobs. After all, who becomes a UK border officer? Answer: people who can't find any other type of work. No one wants to be a customs officer when they grow up." FFS GROW UP and stop whining every time a law enforcement official does what they are paid - BY THE TAXPAYER - to do.

      Delete
  2. Paysan27 September 2013 at 09:38

    Interesting isn’t it about the French reputation for rudeness. I am retired in rural France after working as engineer for a U.S. company in Paris. In my experience, generally, I would say politeness and good manners are the norm take you a very long way. It is quite normal to wish anybody you meet good day and at the bakers most of the necessary conversation is politeness.
    You certainly can run across rudeness, but with the possible exception of taxi drivers it is usually provoked. American red neck tourists shouting at Parisian waiters, they are going to lose, are possibly the worst, with English football supporters coming a close second.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Defence Brief21 October 2013 at 21:22

      I agree. Went to Paris a while back and everyone was very polite and friendly.

      Stayed in La Rochelle and got some abuse from a very drunk elderly Frenchman who clearly hated the Brits since he kept shouting abuse thinking we couldn't understand him although everyone else on his table and the staff all looked mortified by him.

      On the whole I can't say the French live up to their reputation at all.

      Delete
  3. The Justice of the Peace28 September 2013 at 10:59

    Politeness is a simple way to lubricate the interface between strangers who for a fleeting moment have something or some task in common and to smooth that moment to their mutual benefit. It is usually an age related learning experience.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Andy29 September 2013 at 20:53

    Unless you're talking about kids who stay overnight at school, I think you want 'border control'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Defence Brief21 October 2013 at 21:15

      Ahh yes... I'll blame that one on auto-correct

      Delete
  5. citychurches30 September 2013 at 11:38

    The politeness went noticeably downhill when they decided to put them into uniforms.

    After a trip abroad, dealing with uniformed goons at every border (IME the US ones are often the worst), coming back to Blighty and being greeted by normal people at the border used to be a pleasant sign that you're back in civilisation.

    No longer, sadly.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are items referred to in s.9’s as exhibits bound to be served?

  Background - CPS served a witness statement on me that exhibited two BWV clips that are potentially relevant to the Crown’s case and may have some relevance to the defence case insofar as they are likely to show the lighting and weather at the time events happened. Somebody has listed the clips as unused material rather than putting them in the exhibits folder that accompanies the served evidence. This raised an interesting (to me anyway) question about whether a party who exhibits an item in a statement is bound to serve it on their opponent. At court the judge took the view that the Crown were at liberty to classify items exhibited in s9s as unused material if they chose not to rely upon them in evidence. I took the view that if they are exhibited then they must be served along with the witness statement that exhibits the item and that the solution to a situation where the Crown say they are now unused is to edit the witness statement to remove the reference, by agreement with the
More gibberish >>

Is there twice as much violent crime in the UK versus the USA?

Image
The tweet from Charlie Kirk I came across a screenshot of a Twitter post while on Facebook this morning. The original post now has 11,000 retweets and 23,000 likes on Twitter. As you can see from the picture somebody called Charlie Kirk, who is a right-wing American commentator, claims that there are 933 violent crimes in the UK per 100,000 people. This is more than double the rate he claims for the USA where he says there are only 399 violent crimes per 100,000 people. The UK doesn’t feel that violent to me, so is it true? We’re all gonna die According to the FBI, in 2016 there were 1,248,185 violent crimes committed across the whole of the USA. That is an increase of 4.1% on the 2015 figure but still represented only 386.3 violent crimes per 100,000 people . So, Mr Kirk appears to be slightly overestimating the violent crime in the USA. I should say that I am using the 2016 figures as those are the latest available on the FBI website, so maybe he has slightly differe
More gibberish >>

Driving without insurance

Image
Insurance is a contract that remains in force until it expires or is cancelled As you may, or may not, know I specialise in motoring law and most of my work involves defending people accused of drink driving . With the drink driving often come other road traffic offences such as driving while disqualified and driving without insurance. It’s driving without insurance I want to talk about today because I think far too many police officers, solicitors, barristers and judges miss a key legal point when looking at these cases. I’ve received prosecution papers today for somebody accused of driving while disqualified and driving without insurance. The no insurance element is claim that the suspect did not tell the insurer about the disqualification. In his statement, the police officers says, “ [I] contacted [the insurer] who called me back informing me they would not consider the insurance policy valid as there were no convictions disclosed.” Looks like an open an
More gibberish >>