Skip to main content

BIker Defence Solicitors

It's that time of the year when a bit of unashamed self-publicising is called for.

As a biker I have decided to set up a firm specialising in defending motorcyclists who have been accused of driving offences, such as drink driving, speeding, etc.  It's called Biker Defence Solicitors and has a website, which you can find at

While we specialise in defending bikers, I also drive a car and could probably be persuaded to defend anybody up to no good behind the wheel as well... feel free to drop me an email at for more information.

There endth the blatant ad.


  1. Sorry to be picky, but your banner has a spelling mistake.

    That said - speaking as both a JP and also a Pan European rider - it's good to see your site.

    All the best...

  2. Ed (not Bystander)28 April 2012 at 20:51


  3. Haha, you see that is why I post stuff here.


    I've always had a problem with words like specalising - whenever there's a mix of i's and s's I seem to make mistakes. Facsimile is another one I misspell all the time.

    Doesn't help that one of my computers checks spellings as I go for most words, but not all and the others only do it if you ask... sure I've set something up wrong somewhere.

    Thanks again.

  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

  5. As you may have guessed, I fell into the trap of all pedants! Just wanted to suggest that you might want to run a spellchecker across the "bikerdefence" website.

  6. As you may have guessed, I fell into the trap of all pedants! Just wanted to suggest that you might want to run a spellchecker across the "bikerdefence" website.

  7. Thanks for the feedback. I've run a spell check over the entire site in Word and only found one spelling error where I'd put "solciitor", which oddly the neither the browser based spell checker nor the Wordpress one picked up on. I also noticed I'd put "of" instead of "or" in one page.

    Have I missed something else? I'm getting paranoid now.

  8. Do you no longer work with this firm doing regular criminal work? I always have a fear of being wrongly arrested and convicted a la Sam Hallam and would prefer to try to pick a defence solicitor I feel would act well for me.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ched Evans

Before I begin, I will say that at around 4,500 words this is probably the longest blog I’ve ever posted but I think it’s all necessary to set the scene for this case and explain the background that has been largely ignored or airbrushed in the press. Despite its length, I have not attempted to include every little detail of either fact or law but have done my best to provide a balanced picture of the Ched Evans case, what happened and why the courts reached the decisions they did. There has been so much written about the Ched Evans case over the past weekend, much of it based on a very shaky grasp of the facts and law, that I decided I would read up about the case and weigh in (hopefully on a slightly firmer footing than most of the articles I’ve read so far).

Broadly speaking there seem to be three groups who have opinions on the case:
1.Sexual violence groups (including people describing themselves as “radical feminists”) who appear to take the view that the case is awful, the Court o…

How do the police decide whether to charge a suspect?

A question I’m often asked by clients (and in a roundabout way by people arriving at this blog using searches that ask the question in a variety of ways), is “how do the police decide whether to charge or take no further action (NFA)?”
What are the options?
Let’s have a quick think about what options are available to the police at the end of an investigation.
First, they can charge or report you for summons to attend court.  Charging means that you are given police bail and are required to attend court in person.  A summons is an order from the court for you to attend or for you to send a solicitor on your behalf.  In many cases where a person is summonsed, the court will allow you the option of entering a plea by post.
Second, you may be given a caution.  These can be a simple caution, which on the face of it is a warning not to be naughty in future, or it can be a conditional caution.  Conditions could include a requirement to pay for the cost of damage or compensation, etc.  Either…

Bid to prevent defendants knowing who accuses them of a crime

When I read The Trial by Kafka and Nineteen Eighty-Four by Orwell, I took them as warnings of how a bad justice system wrecks lives of those caught up in it. Sadly, some Members of Parliament and the House of Lords seem to view the books more as a guide to how they would like our Criminal Justice System to run. Today, I read of plans to hide the names of accusers and witnesses from defendants in a large number of cases. Victims of sexual offences, such as rape, have had the right to lifelong anonymity for many years now. This means that it is a criminal offence to publish information that will lead to a complainant being identified. A Bill currently being considered by Parliament would extend that anonymity to bar defendants and their lawyers knowing the name of the person accusing them. This would apply not only in sexual offences, as has been reported in the press, but also in violent offences.
The anonymity currently offered to victims of sexual offences is not total, the complainant…