Skip to main content

What would you do?

Having just read a set of case papers, I was struck by the reaction of one witness to what he describes as a group of 3 men and a woman viciously attacking a lone man on the street outside his home.

Let's imagine that you wake up in the early hours to see a man taking a serious beating on your doorstep, do you:

1. Watch for 10 minutes;
2. Find your iPhone and video the attack;
3. Hide so that the attackers don't see you at the window; or
4. Call the police.

In this case the man did the first three.  He watched for ten minutes then when a break in proceedings came along he found his iPhone and videoed part two taking care to hide so he wasn't seen. 

At no time did he think to call for help.


  1. Not on the same scale as this, but I was left with a similar feeling of 'why did nobody bother to help' trying to leave a supermarket a while ago. After filling the car with freezer items, I departed the parking space only to find the whole carpark log-jammed. Slowly we all inched towards the exit and one car at a time squeezed out onto the main road.

    After an hour I got to the exit to find the cause of the problem. An old chap had broken down in the middle of the traffic lights, this had brought all 3 directions governed by the lights to a standstill.

    I simply hopped out the car, check he was OK then pushed his car out of the junction, up onto the pavement and freed up the junction. I could not believe that no one else has seen fit to help this old gent and would rather sit with ice-cream slowly defrosting than get out and help.

    After this the roads cleared like pulling a plug out of the sink. I drove off with a wave to the chap and saw the RAC van heading in his direction. But, looking back I find it hard to believe that for an hour people were happy to let this chap just sit there and simply squeeze on by.

  2. I wonder why people are scared to get involved any more? What profession is to blame?

  3. I don't know Jaded, which profession is to blame? I can't imagine why you'd be scared to call the police but not scared to video the incident.

  4. Probably a rhetorical question above I assume?
    The profession that has "no win no fee" as its slogan?.
    Calling the police makes you a witness in any possible criminal trial where you can get ripped apart in the box.Simply filming means showing your mates down the pub or posting on you tube.Or if it's really good it could go on "you've been framed".

  5. Jade is right - the balance has shifted to the point where the risks of 'doing the right thing' are too high in many parts of the country. why? largely due to the legal system and the legal professions treatment of witnesses, and the states inability to protect witnesses outside court.

  6. If you seriously think that calling the police is too risky but filming a violent incident is okay then it really isn't lawyers who have the problem.. it is you!

    In any case, no win no fee has bugger all to do with criminal law! If you want a criminal defence lawyer and you don't qualify for legal aid then you can pay for it or go with out!

    If you are telling the truth then it's pretty difficult to rip a witness to shreds!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ched Evans

Before I begin, I will say that at around 4,500 words this is probably the longest blog I’ve ever posted but I think it’s all necessary to set the scene for this case and explain the background that has been largely ignored or airbrushed in the press. Despite its length, I have not attempted to include every little detail of either fact or law but have done my best to provide a balanced picture of the Ched Evans case, what happened and why the courts reached the decisions they did. There has been so much written about the Ched Evans case over the past weekend, much of it based on a very shaky grasp of the facts and law, that I decided I would read up about the case and weigh in (hopefully on a slightly firmer footing than most of the articles I’ve read so far).

Broadly speaking there seem to be three groups who have opinions on the case:
1.Sexual violence groups (including people describing themselves as “radical feminists”) who appear to take the view that the case is awful, the Court o…

How do the police decide whether to charge a suspect?

A question I’m often asked by clients (and in a roundabout way by people arriving at this blog using searches that ask the question in a variety of ways), is “how do the police decide whether to charge or take no further action (NFA)?”
What are the options?
Let’s have a quick think about what options are available to the police at the end of an investigation.
First, they can charge or report you for summons to attend court.  Charging means that you are given police bail and are required to attend court in person.  A summons is an order from the court for you to attend or for you to send a solicitor on your behalf.  In many cases where a person is summonsed, the court will allow you the option of entering a plea by post.
Second, you may be given a caution.  These can be a simple caution, which on the face of it is a warning not to be naughty in future, or it can be a conditional caution.  Conditions could include a requirement to pay for the cost of damage or compensation, etc.  Either…

Bid to prevent defendants knowing who accuses them of a crime

When I read The Trial by Kafka and Nineteen Eighty-Four by Orwell, I took them as warnings of how a bad justice system wrecks lives of those caught up in it. Sadly, some Members of Parliament and the House of Lords seem to view the books more as a guide to how they would like our Criminal Justice System to run. Today, I read of plans to hide the names of accusers and witnesses from defendants in a large number of cases. Victims of sexual offences, such as rape, have had the right to lifelong anonymity for many years now. This means that it is a criminal offence to publish information that will lead to a complainant being identified. A Bill currently being considered by Parliament would extend that anonymity to bar defendants and their lawyers knowing the name of the person accusing them. This would apply not only in sexual offences, as has been reported in the press, but also in violent offences.
The anonymity currently offered to victims of sexual offences is not total, the complainant…