Skip to main content

Over charged by $10? Then you need a lawyer costing $1.44M

Mercedes from Hertz car rental
Hertz car hire has some nice cars

This morning the postman dropped a letter through my door from a US attorney in the case of Sobel et al v The Hertz Corp et al, which was sent to me by my in-laws who are asking me what they should do about it.

Basically, the notice informs customers of Alamo Rent a Car that they could be entitled to compensation for a charge that was erroneously added to a number of bills between 2007 and 2009.  This is called a class action and it seems that my in-laws must actively exclude themselves from the action to avoid having anything to do with it.

According to the notice three teams of attorneys have worked tirelessly on this case for four-years and will be claiming fees that come to a little over $1.4M from the defendants.  The total compensation they have negotiated is one $10 voucher off any future car rental taken in the next 18-months per customer.

Brilliant, so for a fee of $1.4M they have negotiated a settlement worth $10 to each person in the class action; is that a proportionate fee for the benefit to their clients?  In bringing this action, they have also taken up time over the past four-years of a Nevada state judge who acted as mediator in this case.  I'm sure people hear about these stories from the US and form opinions that all lawyers the world over take cases that any sensible individual would be told, "looks it's terrible that they overcharged you but is it worth your effort and expense suing these people?"  In this country, a complaint to trading standards would probably be a better and more proportionate response than lawyering up.

We don't have class actions like this in England and Wales and I was always taught that they are a bad thing, although having seen the bill in this case I'm starting to come around to the idea of introducing them!

Incidentally, I recently damaged my car while driving out of my son's nursery on a steel plate that had been installed on a speed bump by the gate.  I was more than a little surprised when everybody who read my tongue-in-cheek status update on Facebook told me to sue the nursery.  The repair cost me a few hundred pounds and maybe I could have sued - but where would it get me?  I get my money back, the nursery, which is already being considered for closure, has to pay out more money it can ill afford.  Potentially, the nursery closes, my little boy can no longer go to a nursery he loves and we have to send him somewhere that came a distant second when we were choosing a place for him.  People believe the adverts when they say "where there's blame there's a claim".  Yes, there maybe a claim, but rushing to law is not always the best way of settling a dispute.

UPDATE 1 October 2015

I updated this post in light of the news that as of today class actions, like the one described above, will be possible here in England and Wales (sorry I've no idea if they can be brought under Scottish law).  The English law will be more restrictive, allowing class actions in limited circumstances and only with the approval of the Competition Appeal Tribunal.


  1. Perhaps you need to lie down. Better check if the Law Society has put out a contract and as for the Ayatolla.......don`t ask.......

  2. Compromise. Tell the nursery that you are considering legal action that may prove expensive for them and suggest they pay for the repair and negotiate.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ched Evans

Before I begin, I will say that at around 4,500 words this is probably the longest blog I’ve ever posted but I think it’s all necessary to set the scene for this case and explain the background that has been largely ignored or airbrushed in the press. Despite its length, I have not attempted to include every little detail of either fact or law but have done my best to provide a balanced picture of the Ched Evans case, what happened and why the courts reached the decisions they did. There has been so much written about the Ched Evans case over the past weekend, much of it based on a very shaky grasp of the facts and law, that I decided I would read up about the case and weigh in (hopefully on a slightly firmer footing than most of the articles I’ve read so far).

Broadly speaking there seem to be three groups who have opinions on the case:
1.Sexual violence groups (including people describing themselves as “radical feminists”) who appear to take the view that the case is awful, the Court o…

How do the police decide whether to charge a suspect?

A question I’m often asked by clients (and in a roundabout way by people arriving at this blog using searches that ask the question in a variety of ways), is “how do the police decide whether to charge or take no further action (NFA)?”
What are the options?
Let’s have a quick think about what options are available to the police at the end of an investigation.
First, they can charge or report you for summons to attend court.  Charging means that you are given police bail and are required to attend court in person.  A summons is an order from the court for you to attend or for you to send a solicitor on your behalf.  In many cases where a person is summonsed, the court will allow you the option of entering a plea by post.
Second, you may be given a caution.  These can be a simple caution, which on the face of it is a warning not to be naughty in future, or it can be a conditional caution.  Conditions could include a requirement to pay for the cost of damage or compensation, etc.  Either…

Bid to prevent defendants knowing who accuses them of a crime

When I read The Trial by Kafka and Nineteen Eighty-Four by Orwell, I took them as warnings of how a bad justice system wrecks lives of those caught up in it. Sadly, some Members of Parliament and the House of Lords seem to view the books more as a guide to how they would like our Criminal Justice System to run. Today, I read of plans to hide the names of accusers and witnesses from defendants in a large number of cases. Victims of sexual offences, such as rape, have had the right to lifelong anonymity for many years now. This means that it is a criminal offence to publish information that will lead to a complainant being identified. A Bill currently being considered by Parliament would extend that anonymity to bar defendants and their lawyers knowing the name of the person accusing them. This would apply not only in sexual offences, as has been reported in the press, but also in violent offences.
The anonymity currently offered to victims of sexual offences is not total, the complainant…