Skip to main content

Here goes....

Welcome to my new blog.  This is my first ever effort at blogging and even though I am already typing I don't really know what I am going to be talking about in this first post.  So I guess I'll just tell you a little about myself and what I do.

I am 31-years-old and I work in east London, Hackney to be exact.  I work for a small two-partner firm of solicitors specialising in crime.  Although we call ourselves criminal defence specialists, in fact the firm does more than just defence.  Others in the firm also carry out a lot of appeal and prison law work.  For those who aren't familiar with prison law, it encompasses everything from a prisoner who has broken the rules and is facing disciplinary proceedings to those serving life sentences who are looking to be release on appeal.

Anyway, this post isn't supposed to be about the firm it's about me and what I do.

I am a duty solicitor, so if a suspect is arrested and wants "the duty" I am one of the lucky soles who gets a call at 3am asking me to pop along to the police station.  It also means that I attend magistrates courts to represent those who are appearing without a solicitor to represent them.  Over time I'll be talking much more about both of these topics.

As well as the duty work I am a solicitor-advocate.  I originally trained as a barrister before converting to become a solicitor.  Being a solicitor-advocate is pretty much like being both a solicitor and barrister, you get to do the litigation thing and show up to court once in a while with your wig and gown.  Again, I'll be talking more about the fun, games and derision to which an advocate (particularly a solicitor-advocate) in the Crown Court experiences.

I'll probably also end up posting a few angry rants at some point - I do rant, I'm afraid.

As a solicitor, I have a duty of confidentiality toward my clients, so if you think that I am talking about a case you are involved in then you are almost certainly wrong as I will be editing the facts sufficiently to protect my client's confidentiality while (hopefully) getting my point across.

I will try to be informative when I write and maybe even entertain one or two of you.  I'd like to read any comments people have as I post more content.  In the past, I have read quite a few blogs and have posted my views - sometimes the responses have re-enforced my opinion and sometimes the comments have changed my mind completely, so do please post.

Comments

  1. Ed (not Bystander)13 October 2010 at 17:13

    I'll look forward to reading this. I've added you to my Google Reader!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Ed, my first comment and you plan to read it? Now I'm feeling the pressure!!

    Thanks for saying hi :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds OK, but you'll need to blog in a more Rumpolesque manner to keep your readers amused.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As a new blogger myself, I wish you well and have taken the liberty of posting a link from mine. Cheers,

    www.probationmatters.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. More Rumpolesque is what you want? Well I'll do my best but unfortunately, Rumpole was a barrister of the old school whereas I am but a humble solicitor whose orations made while on his hind legs can but hope to touch upon the might and wisdom of the great Rumpole.

    Jim, I have been reading your blog for a few weeks now and enjoy it very much.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Looking forward to this one - studying historical criminal law means that there is a real risk that I will lose touch with reality (whatever 'reality' actually is...) and the workings of the criminal law today.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well Nick, your blog was just linked to an entire class of law students at the University of Southampton.

    We're looking to you for inspiration.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I came here via the Magistrate so blame him for cursing you with the pedant:

    "I am one of the lucky soles"

    The spellcheck won't help you but a little bit of judicial reading of what you have written might. Otherwise good luck, I have enjoyed your first two posts.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Definite inspiration. I want to be a solicitor but am now torn with wanting to be a barrister. It seems you may have already given the Legal answer to my Legal question

    ReplyDelete
  10. As a magistrate (who also follows Bystander's blog) it'll be interesting to have your views - you defence briefs are a bit of a mystery to most of us JP's I think!
    Good luck with the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Blogging is all about having a good rant. Rant away and enjoy it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Cloak and Dagger15 October 2010 at 18:04

    This blog needs updating. Where's Rumpole?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Welcome to the world of (personal) blogging. The more we let each other see where we are coming from the better the understanding that is developed. That can only be a good thing.
    I'm out of the court system now, so I just witter on about life in the sun.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why did you change from being a Barrister to a Criminal Solicitor? Will tell my fellow law students to follow you at Anglia Ruskin. (Two Uni's hanging on your every comment - no pressure then!)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Best of luck to you - looks like a promising start.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Can i change my mind n have my case dealt with at magistrates court...adter submitting my application to crown court? I asked for it to go to crown court havin been given the choice! I havent had a date set yet?!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anon with the court problem, I suggest you speak to your solicitor and ask him. In theory no you can't as the case became a Crown Court case as soon as you elected. However, I've seen weirder things happen. Speak to your solicitor for advice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ched Evans

Before I begin, I will say that at around 4,500 words this is probably the longest blog I’ve ever posted but I think it’s all necessary to set the scene for this case and explain the background that has been largely ignored or airbrushed in the press. Despite its length, I have not attempted to include every little detail of either fact or law but have done my best to provide a balanced picture of the Ched Evans case, what happened and why the courts reached the decisions they did. There has been so much written about the Ched Evans case over the past weekend, much of it based on a very shaky grasp of the facts and law, that I decided I would read up about the case and weigh in (hopefully on a slightly firmer footing than most of the articles I’ve read so far).

Broadly speaking there seem to be three groups who have opinions on the case:
1.Sexual violence groups (including people describing themselves as “radical feminists”) who appear to take the view that the case is awful, the Court o…

How do the police decide whether to charge a suspect?

A question I’m often asked by clients (and in a roundabout way by people arriving at this blog using searches that ask the question in a variety of ways), is “how do the police decide whether to charge or take no further action (NFA)?”
What are the options?
Let’s have a quick think about what options are available to the police at the end of an investigation.
First, they can charge or report you for summons to attend court.  Charging means that you are given police bail and are required to attend court in person.  A summons is an order from the court for you to attend or for you to send a solicitor on your behalf.  In many cases where a person is summonsed, the court will allow you the option of entering a plea by post.
Second, you may be given a caution.  These can be a simple caution, which on the face of it is a warning not to be naughty in future, or it can be a conditional caution.  Conditions could include a requirement to pay for the cost of damage or compensation, etc.  Either…

Bid to prevent defendants knowing who accuses them of a crime

When I read The Trial by Kafka and Nineteen Eighty-Four by Orwell, I took them as warnings of how a bad justice system wrecks lives of those caught up in it. Sadly, some Members of Parliament and the House of Lords seem to view the books more as a guide to how they would like our Criminal Justice System to run. Today, I read of plans to hide the names of accusers and witnesses from defendants in a large number of cases. Victims of sexual offences, such as rape, have had the right to lifelong anonymity for many years now. This means that it is a criminal offence to publish information that will lead to a complainant being identified. A Bill currently being considered by Parliament would extend that anonymity to bar defendants and their lawyers knowing the name of the person accusing them. This would apply not only in sexual offences, as has been reported in the press, but also in violent offences.
The anonymity currently offered to victims of sexual offences is not total, the complainant…