Police Christmas Drink Driving Campaigns 2017


Woman providing breath into police roadside breathalyser
"Not the usual suspects" - police are on the lookout for drink drivers of all ages

It’s only November but with Christmas less than six-weeks away you can be sure that police forces across the country are well into planning their Christmas 2017 drink driving campaigns.

Last year saw thousands of people breath tested and thousands more arrested across the country for drink driving and police forces reporting a shift in the type of people being arrested. People often associate drink driving with young men; however, West Yorkshire Police reported in January 2017 that 40% of people arrested for drink driving were over 35 years old and of those a significant proportion were women. Dorset Police supported those sentiments labelling the majority of drink drivers as, “not your usual suspects”, pointing out that most of those arrested are normally law-abiding people who misjudged how much alcohol they could drink before driving.

Drink driving the morning after a night out drinking is something that regularly catches people out. You have few drinks and feel you are safe to drive but you are wrong and are subsequently arrested for drink driving – at London Drink Driving Solicitor we see people fall into this trap every day and I notice this morning that the Morning After campaign has launched its Christmas campaign urging people to make sure a party popper is the only thing they are blowing this Christmas. For my part, I’ve found that a big problem is that people are told that they eliminate about a unit of alcohol an hour when in fact the normal range of elimination is between 3 microgrammes all the way up to 13 microgrammes of alcohol per hour when measure in breath – so one person could eliminate alcohol more than four times faster than his friend and both be considered to be within the normal elimination range. I often hear police officers telling people not to rely on home breath test kits because they may not be reliable; however, I’d suggest that the science behind the home test kits is no different to that behind police roadside kits and you are better off checking with a home test kit than just hoping for the best.

While police are always on the lookout for people who may be drink driving there will be additional publicity about the issue in the coming weeks and you can expect members of the public to be pro-active in reporting anybody they suspect of drink driving. Inspector Matt Butler of Dorset Police went out of their way last year to thank members of the public after the 2016 drink driving campaign, “as in previous years, I would like to thank those members of the public who called us to report a drink driver.”

You can be sure that police will be performing operations to stop vehicles for random checks and breath testing anybody they suspect of drink driving as a result of those checks. You will also be breath tested if you involved in an accident, even if the accident was not your fault! Police may also ask you to take an impairment test if they believe you have been driving under the influence of drugs.

The roadside tests for both alcohol and drugs are not as reliable as those used in the police station so you may be arrested even if you are not actually over the limit – I note that West Yorkshire Police arrested 165 people in the run up to Christmas 2016 but charged only 94 people with offences.

If you do find yourself accused of drink driving, drug driving, failing to provide a specimen or any other motoring offence then you can get expert legal advice from specialist drink driving solicitors at London Drink Driving Solicitor by calling 020 8242 4440 – lines are open 24 hours.
Location: London, UK

Comments

  1. Anonymous18 November 2017 at 02:22

    "You can be sure that police will be performing operations to stop vehicles for random checks ...".
    Really?
    In this English there has been a noticeable and substantial increase in speeding, broken headlights, mis-spaced number plates, shear bad driving, noisy motor bikes, obstruction of corners and pedestrian crossings, jumping lights etc. Is anything to do with the fact that "normal" patrols are now so rare.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Defence Brief21 November 2017 at 17:13

      Yes I rather suspect it is. But around times of the year when people are likely to drink and drive you tend to see operations aimed at finding those people, e.g. mobile speed cameras set up with officers on the scene to stop and speak to drivers, the idea being that people who commit one type of offence tend to commit others.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are items referred to in s.9’s as exhibits bound to be served?

  Background - CPS served a witness statement on me that exhibited two BWV clips that are potentially relevant to the Crown’s case and may have some relevance to the defence case insofar as they are likely to show the lighting and weather at the time events happened. Somebody has listed the clips as unused material rather than putting them in the exhibits folder that accompanies the served evidence. This raised an interesting (to me anyway) question about whether a party who exhibits an item in a statement is bound to serve it on their opponent. At court the judge took the view that the Crown were at liberty to classify items exhibited in s9s as unused material if they chose not to rely upon them in evidence. I took the view that if they are exhibited then they must be served along with the witness statement that exhibits the item and that the solution to a situation where the Crown say they are now unused is to edit the witness statement to remove the reference, by agreement with the
More gibberish >>

Is there twice as much violent crime in the UK versus the USA?

Image
The tweet from Charlie Kirk I came across a screenshot of a Twitter post while on Facebook this morning. The original post now has 11,000 retweets and 23,000 likes on Twitter. As you can see from the picture somebody called Charlie Kirk, who is a right-wing American commentator, claims that there are 933 violent crimes in the UK per 100,000 people. This is more than double the rate he claims for the USA where he says there are only 399 violent crimes per 100,000 people. The UK doesn’t feel that violent to me, so is it true? We’re all gonna die According to the FBI, in 2016 there were 1,248,185 violent crimes committed across the whole of the USA. That is an increase of 4.1% on the 2015 figure but still represented only 386.3 violent crimes per 100,000 people . So, Mr Kirk appears to be slightly overestimating the violent crime in the USA. I should say that I am using the 2016 figures as those are the latest available on the FBI website, so maybe he has slightly differe
More gibberish >>

Driving without insurance

Image
Insurance is a contract that remains in force until it expires or is cancelled As you may, or may not, know I specialise in motoring law and most of my work involves defending people accused of drink driving . With the drink driving often come other road traffic offences such as driving while disqualified and driving without insurance. It’s driving without insurance I want to talk about today because I think far too many police officers, solicitors, barristers and judges miss a key legal point when looking at these cases. I’ve received prosecution papers today for somebody accused of driving while disqualified and driving without insurance. The no insurance element is claim that the suspect did not tell the insurer about the disqualification. In his statement, the police officers says, “ [I] contacted [the insurer] who called me back informing me they would not consider the insurance policy valid as there were no convictions disclosed.” Looks like an open an
More gibberish >>