What's the point any more?
Not my judge... but might as well have been I had the joy of travelling to court today for a wasted costs hearing. If you don’t know, where costs are incurred by a party to proceedings because of an improper act or omission by another party the court may award costs against the party who did the improper act or omitted to act. These are known by lawyers as wasted costs. This is important because it allows a party to recover costs they would not have incurred but for the other party’s error. This can be used by the prosecution or defence in criminal proceedings. It is not an easy test to meet and the party making the application must show that there was something improper about the other party’s act or omission. In my case, the Defendant had been acquitted. More correctly, the prosecution had discontinued the case the day before trial despite being aware that they had no case since the very first court hearing. Had they acted properly at...